Sustainable agri-food production
Permanent URI for this community
Browse
Browsing Sustainable agri-food production by Subject "agriculture"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Are stakeholders ready to transform phosphorus use in food systems? A transdisciplinary study in a livestock intensive system.(Elsevier, 2022-02-12) Martin-Ortega, Julia; Rothwell, Shane A.; Anderson, Aine; Okumah, Murat; Lyon, Christopher; Sherry, Erin; Johnston, Christopher; Withers, Paul J.A.; Doody, DonnachaFood systems worldwide are vulnerable to Phosphorus (P) supply disruptions and price fluctuations. Current P use is also highly inefficient, generating large surpluses and pollution. Global food security and aquatic ecosystems are in jeopardy if transformative action is not taken. This paper pivots from earlier (predominantly conceptual) work to develop and analyse a P transdisciplinary scenario process, assessing stakeholders potential for transformative thinking in P use in the food system. Northern Ireland, a highly livestock-intensive system, was used as case study for illustrating such process. The stakeholder engagement takes a normative stance in that it sets the explicit premise that the food system needs to be transformed and asks stakeholders to engage in a dialogue on how that transformation can be achieved. A Substance Flow Analysis of P flows and stocks was employed to construct visions for alternative futures and stimulate stakeholder discussions on system responses. These were analysed for their transformative potential using a triple-loop social learning framework. For the most part, stakeholder responses remained transitional or incremental, rather than being fundamentally transformative. The process did unveil some deeper levers that could be acted upon to move the system further along the spectrum of transformational change (e.g. changes in food markets, creation of new P markets, destocking, new types of land production and radical land use changes), providing clues of what an aspirational system could look like. Replicated and adapted elsewhere, this process can serve as diagnostics of current stakeholders thinking and potential, as well as for the identification of those deeper levers, opening up avenues to work upon for global scale transformation.Item Greenhouse gas and ammonia emission mitigation priorities for UK policy targets(Higher Education Press, 2023-05-06) Buckingham, Sarah; Topp, Cairistiona F. E.; Smith, Pete; Eory, Vera; Chadwick, David R.; Baxter, Christina K.; Cloy, Joanna M.; Connolly, Shaun; Cooledge, Emily C.; Cowan, Nicholas J.; Drewer, Julia; Duffy, Colm; Fox, Naomi J.; Jebari, Asma; Jenkins, Becky; Krol, Dominika J.; Marsden, Karina A.; McAuliffe, Graham A.; Morrisson, Steven; O'Flaherty, Vincent; Ramsey, Rachael; Richards, Karl G.; Roehe, Rainer; Smith, Jo; Smith, Kate; Takahashi, Taro; Thorman, Rachel E.; Williams, John; Wiltshire, Jeremy; Rees, Robert M.Agriculture is essential for providing food and maintaining food security while concurrently delivering multiple other ecosystem services. However, agricultural systems are generally a net source of greenhouse gases and ammonia. They, therefore, need to substantively contribute to climate change mitigation and net zero ambitions. It is widely acknowledged that there is a need to further reduce and mitigate emissions across sectors, including agriculture to address the climate emergency and emissions gap. This discussion paper outlines a collation of opinions from a range of experts within agricultural research and advisory roles following a greenhouse gas and ammonia emission mitigation workshop held in the UK in March 2022. The meeting identified the top mitigation priorities within the UK’s agricultural sector to achieve reductions in greenhouse gases and ammonia that are compatible with policy targets. In addition, experts provided an overview of what they believe are the key knowledge gaps, future opportunities and co-benefits to mitigation practices as well as indicating the potential barriers to uptake for mitigation scenarios discussed.Item Modelling-based identification of factors influencing campylobacters in chicken broiler houses and on carcasses sampled after processing and chilling(Wiley, 2017-03-04) Hutchison, M.L.; Taylor, M.J.; Tchorzewska, G.; Ford, G.; Madden, R.H.; Knowles, T.G.Aims: To identify production and processing practices that might reduceCampylobacter numbers contaminating chicken broiler carcasses.Methods and Results: The numbers of campylobacters were determined oncarcass neck skins after processing or in broiler house litter samples.Supplementary information that described farm layouts, farming conditions forindividual flocks, the slaughterhouse layouts and operating conditions insideplants was collected, matched with each Campylobacter test result. Statisticalmodels predicting the numbers of campylobacters on neck skins and in litterwere constructed. Carcass microbial contamination was more stronglyinfluenced by on-farm production practices compared with slaughterhouseactivities. We observed correlations between the chilling, washing anddefeathering stages of processing and the numbers of campylobacters oncarcasses. There were factors on farm that also correlated with numbers ofcampylobacters in litter. These included bird gender, the exclusion of dogsfrom houses, beetle presence in the house litter and the materials used toconstruct the house frame.Conclusions: Changes in farming practices have greater potential for reducingchicken carcass microbial contamination compared with processinginterventions.Significance and Impact of the Study: Routine commercial practices wereidentified that were correlated with lowered numbers of campylobacters.Consequently, these practices are likely to be both cost-effective and suitablefor adoption into established farms and commercial processing