DSpace Repository

Revisiting the Relationships between Fat-to-Protein Ratio in Milk and Energy Balance in Dairy Cows of Different Parities, and at Different Stages of Lactation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cabezas-Garcia, Edward
dc.contributor.author Gordon, Alan W.
dc.contributor.author Mulligan, Finbar J.
dc.contributor.author Ferris, Conrad P.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-11-16T16:24:04Z
dc.date.available 2021-11-16T16:24:04Z
dc.date.issued 2021-11-14
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12518/372
dc.identifier.citation Cabezas-Garcia, E. H., Gordon, A. W., Mulligan, F. J. and Ferris, C. P. (2021) ‘Revisiting the Relationships between Fat-to-Protein Ratio in Milk and Energy Balance in Dairy Cows of Different Parities, and at Different Stages of Lactation’, Animals. MDPI AG. doi: 10.3390/ani11113256. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2076-2615 (electronic)
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113256
dc.description Publication history: Accepted - 12 November 2021; Published - 14 November 2021. en_US
dc.description.abstract Simple Summary Data from 840 Holstein-Friesian cows (1321 lactations) were used to evaluate trends in fat-to-protein ratios in milk (FPR), and the use of FPR as an indicator of energy balance (EB). The fat-to-protein ratio was negatively related to EB, and this relationship became more negative with increased parity. Regression slopes describing linear relationships between FPR and EB differed over time, although trends were inconsistent. Similarly, ‘High’ FPR scores in milk (≥1.5) were consistently associated with a greater negative energy balance, milk yields, body weight loss, and plasma non-esterified fatty acid concentrations; however, their relationships with dry matter intake did not follow a clear trend. Although FPR can provide an indication of EB at a herd level, this analysis suggests that FPR cannot accurately predict the EB of individual cows. Abstract A statistical re-assessment of aggregated individual cow data was conducted to examine trends in fat-to-protein ratio in milk (FPR), and relationships between FPR and energy balance (EB, MJ of ME/day) in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows of different parities, and at different stages of lactation. The data were collected from 27 long-term production trials conducted between 1996 and 2016 at the Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI) in Hillsborough, Northern Ireland. In total, 1321 lactations (1 to 20 weeks in milk; WIM), derived from 840 individual cows fed mainly grass silage-based diets, were included in the analysis. The energy balance was calculated daily and then averaged weekly for statistical analyses. Data were further split in 4 wk. intervals, namely, 1–4, 5–8, 9–12, 13–16, and 17–20 WIM, and both partial correlations and linear regressions (mixed models) established between the mean FPR and EB during these periods. Three FPR score categories (‘Low’ FPR, <1.0; ‘Normal’ FPR, 1.0–1.5; ‘High’ FPR, >1.5) were adopted and the performance and EB indicators within each category were compared. As expected, multiparous cows experienced a greater negative EB compared to primiparous cows, due to their higher milk production relative to DMI. Relatively minor differences in milk fat and protein content resulted in large differences in FPR curves. Second lactation cows displayed the lowest weekly FPR, and this trend was aligned with smaller BW losses and lower concentrations of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) until at least 8 WIM. Partial correlations between FPR and EB were negative, and ‘greatest’ in early lactation (1–4 WIM; r = −0.38 on average), and gradually decreased as lactation progressed across all parities (17–20 WIM; r = −0.14 on average). With increasing parity, daily EB values tended to become more negative per unit of FPR. In primiparous cows, regression slopes between FPR and EB differed between 1–4 and 5–8 WIM (−54.6 vs. −47.5 MJ of ME/day), while differences in second lactation cows tended towards significance (−57.2 vs. −64.4 MJ of ME/day). Irrespective of the lactation number, after 9–12 WIM, there was a consistent trend for the slope of the linear relationships between FPR and EB to decrease as lactation progressed, with this likely reflecting the decreasing milk nutrient demands of the growing calf. The incidence of ‘High’ FPR scores was greatest during 1–4 WIM, and decreased as lactation progressed. ‘High’ FPR scores were associated with increased energy-corrected milk (ECM) yields across all parities and stages of lactation, and with smaller BW gains and increasing concentrations (log transformed) of blood metabolites (non-esterified fatty acid, NEFA; beta-hydroxybutyrate, BHB) until 8 WIM. Results from the present study highlight the strong relationships between FPR in milk, physiological changes, and EB profiles during early lactation. However, while FPR can provide an indication of EB at a herd level, the large cow-to-cow variation indicates that FPR cannot be used as a robust indicator of EB at an individual cow level. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The interaction between genotype and nutrition in high yielding dairy cows in seasonal grass-based systems of milk production (NutriGen project) was funded by the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (Republic of Ireland) and the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (Northern Ireland) under funding agreement 15/S/675. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MDPI en_US
dc.rights 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/). en_US
dc.subject dairy cows en_US
dc.subject early lactation en_US
dc.subject energy balance en_US
dc.subject fat-to-protein ratio in milk en_US
dc.title Revisiting the Relationships between Fat-to-Protein Ratio in Milk and Energy Balance in Dairy Cows of Different Parities, and at Different Stages of Lactation en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

My Account